Stress comes in different forms and can be caused by various things. Stress, for many people, is an unpleasant but manageable experience that makes us feel anxious or worried about something that we cannot control. For some, stress is an unavoidable part of life that keeps us on our toes, helping us to foster a healthy mental attitude.

Immigrant communities have their own unique sets of stress factors that stem from before and after migration. Pre-migration stress can come from various experiences like threats to safety and home environment, financial challenges, or political and social conditions.

Migration itself offers many challenges which can manifest themselves in an experience of intense and chronic tension. These incidents can be cognitive and physical and have to do with connections with family back home and their standing in the community and the legal system.

Refugees have fled their country because of persecution for religion, ethnicity, nationality, political idea, or membership in a certain social group; they often flee war or natural disasters (UNHCR). The term asylum seekers refer to those seeking refugee status whose claim has not yet been officially recognized by the government (UNHCR).

Undocumented immigrants have entered a country illegally or whose legal permission to stay in the country. The majority of the world’s migrants live in just 18 countries. In these countries, nearly half (46%) of people say immigrants make their country a worse place to live. But in 10 countries, clear majorities view immigrants as a positive force.

The United States is the most likely to hold this view: 74% state that immigrants strengthen their nation due to their challenging tasks plus aptitudes. The survey also finds that majorities across all demographic groups share this positive opinion about immigrants’ contributions to national life.

Immigration status today

The challenges of immigration and assimilation in the 21st century are nothing new. The United States has dealt with race, class, and gender tensions for as long as it has been established. Discrimination, segregation, and violence against racial minorities and immigrants have been a large part of the American story.

There is still labour to be accomplished, as recent events have clarified. Still, we might do well to remember that much of what we see today as uniquely “American” or “contemporary” issues are long-standing problems that all industrial societies face.

Immigration is not only a U.S. concern; it is something that almost every industrialized country has to deal with. The United States receives less than half of the total number of immigrants that arrive in the world annually; most of them go to Europe (Hirschman 2001).

We have been dealing with all these issues for many years now, and we have learned a lot about how to tackle them effectively (and how not to). We will not be able to eliminate racism or discrimination overnight. Still, by learning from past successes and failures in other countries, we can avoid pitfalls and make sure that our progress is lasting rather than temporary. For Law students, the Law dissertation writing service UK online is an amazing way for more content on this topic by the professionals.

The methods to tackle the massive number of immigrants

• Since the summer, Europe has been facing a refugee crisis. Thousands of people from war-torn countries such as Syria and Libya have fled their homes and crossed the Mediterranean to find safety on EU soil.
  The scene at the Hungarian railway station in Budapest last week showed how desperate the situation was getting: thousands of people, many of them children, waited for days in the hopes of being granted permission to board trains that would take them further northward.
  At the same time, some states are quicker at joining up children with parents who have disappeared ahead to search for asylum. Establishing an asylum process across countries for immigrants.

• Providing safe and legal channels for many refugees would help stem the tide of dangerous sea crossings. It would offer safer alternatives to those who currently have no choice but to risk their lives.
  As it stands now, most refugees say they take dangerous journeys to reach Europe because they have no option other than to risk dying at sea. If there were viable alternatives in the form of legal channels that allowed them to reach Europe safely, many refugees would surely be willing to use them.
  There are already examples of this. When an entire country is destroyed by war, or when a country becomes so dangerous that its citizens can no longer live in it, people will flee the country in search of a safe place. It has been occurring for centuries, and it will not stop anytime soon.
  When people cannot find safe places within their own countries, they must seek asylum elsewhere. If all countries followed international law and took in as many as their fair share of people who needed asylum, there would be no refugee crises. No one would need to flee from their home until they found safety somewhere else.

• Truthfully, it is difficult to end people smuggling because its claims are so great, as is their passengers’ unexpected endurance for danger. The EU has accessed targeting Libyan trafficking vessels plus charging smugglers when they reach Italy.
  But for logistical and lawful clarifications, the former would be very challenging in exercise, and the concluding targets only low-level hostages rather than key players. Moreover, the network of smuggling linkages that function throughout North Africa plus the Middle East, outlying the coasts of Libya and Turkey, is so intricate and plenty that dismissing an insufficient of its performers would gain diminutive.
  The alternative approach makes smuggling impossible by providing economic alternatives to those who would otherwise engage in it. It prevents people’s desperation from being used as a tool to coerce them into risking life and limb, which is especially important if they are fleeing war or other desperate circumstances.
  If there were no economic incentives for people smuggling, then Europe would not have to worry about the consequences of disrupting this deadly trade.